An Appraisal
By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
The New York Times: October 10, 2013
Alice Munro, named on Thursday as the winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in
Literature, once observed: “The complexity of things — the things within
things — just seems to be endless. I mean nothing is easy, nothing is
simple.”
That is also a perfect description of Ms. Munro’s quietly radiant short
stories — stories that have established her as one of the foremost
practitioners of the form. Set largely in small-town and rural Canada
and often focused on the lives of girls and women, her tales have the
swoop and density of big, intimate novels, mapping the crevices of
characters’ hearts with cleareyed Chekhovian empathy and wisdom.
Fluent and deceptively artless on the page, these stories are actually
amazingly intricate constructions that move back and forth in time, back
and forth between reality and memory, opening out, magically, to
disclose the long panoramic vistas in these people’s lives (the starts,
stops and reversals that stand out as hinge moments in their personal
histories) and the homely details of their day-to-day routines: the dull
coping with “food and mess and houses” that can take up so much of
their heroines’ time.
Ms. Munro’s stories possess an emotional amplitude and a psychological
density that stand in sharp contrast to the minimalistic work of Raymond
Carver, and to Donald Barthelme’s playful, postmodernist tales. Her
understanding of the music of domestic life, her ability to
simultaneously detail her characters’ inner landscapes and their place
in a meticulously observed community, and her talent for charting “the
progress of love” as it morphs and mutates through time — these gifts
have not only helped Ms. Munro redefine the contours of the contemporary
short story, but have also made her one of today’s most influential
writers, celebrated by authors as disparate as Lorrie Moore, Jonathan
Franzen, Deborah Eisenberg and Mona Simpson.
In short fiction that spans four and a half decades — beginning with the
collection “Dance of the Happy Shades” (1968), through classic volumes
like “The Moons of Jupiter” (1982), “The Progress of Love”(1986), “Friend of My Youth”(1990) and “Open Secrets”
(1994), up to “Dear Life” (2012), which she has said will be her last —
Ms. Munro has given us prismatic portraits of ordinary people that
reveal their intelligence, toughness and capacity to dream, as well as
their lies, blind spots and lapses of courage and good will. Such
descriptions are delivered not with judgmental accountancy, but with the
sort of “unsparing unsentimental love” harbored by a close friend or
family member.
There is always an awareness in her fiction of the subjectivity of
perception, and the kaleidoscopic permutations that memory can work on
reality. In “Friend of My Youth,” the story of a twice-jilted woman
named Flora is remembered by a friend, and that friend’s account, in
turn, is framed by her daughter’s thoughts on the subject, turning
Flora’s sad tale into a kind of Rorschach test for the pair of them.
Like Ms. Munro, many of the women in these stories grew up in small
towns in Canada and, at some point, faced a decision about whether to
stay or to leave for the wider world. Their lifetimes often span decades
of startling social change — from a time and place when tea parties and
white gloves were de rigueur to the days of health food stores and
stripper bars.
For that matter, Ms. Munro’s women, much like John Updike’s men, often
find themselves caught on the margins of shifting cultural mores and
pulled between conflicting imperatives — between rootedness and escape,
domesticity and freedom, between tending to familial responsibilities or
following the urgent promptings of their own hearts.
The narrator of “Miles City, Montana” craves “a place to hide” from the
demands of running a household; she wants to “get busy at my real work,
which was a sort of wooing of distant parts of myself,” only to realize,
after a swimming pool accident, that her self-preoccupation has
endangered her daughter. In “Family Furnishings,” the heroine doesn’t
stay home to take care of her ailing mother, but wins a college
scholarship, moves away to the big city and sets about becoming a
writer.
In story after story, passion is the magnet or the motor that drives
women’s choices. Love and sex, and marriage and adultery are often
mirrors that reveal a Munro heroine’s expectations — her fondest dreams
and cruel self-delusions, her sense of independence and need to belong.
Ms. Munro is adept at tracing the many configurations that intimacy can
take over the years, showing how it can suffocate a marriage or inject
it with a renewed sense of devotion. She shows how sexual ardor can turn
into a “tidy pilot flame” and how an impulsive tryst can become a
treasured memory, hoarded as a bulwark against the banalities of middle
age.
Illness and death frequently intrude upon these stories, and the reader
is constantly reminded of the precariousness of life — and the role that
luck, chance and reckless, spur-of-the-moment choices can play. Some of
Ms. Munro’s characters embrace change as a liberating force that will
lift them out of their humdrum routines, or at least satisfy their avid
curiosity about life. Others regard it with fearful dismay, worried that
they will lose everything they hold dear — or at least everything
familiar.
In “A Wilderness Station,” an orphan named Annie marries a gruff
frontiersman and after his mysterious death, finds herself in jail for
his murder. And in “A Real Life,” a woman who has led a marginal
existence, trapping muskrats for their fur in the Ontario countryside,
meets a visitor from Australia, begins corresponding with him and after
he proposes, moves to Queensland, where she finds herself flying
airplanes and shooting crocodiles.
Some of Ms. Munro’s more recent tales have exchanged the elliptical
narratives she pioneered years ago for a more old-fashioned,
stage-managed approach. Compared to her earlier work, many of the
stories in “Dear Life” feature tightly plotted — even contrived —
narratives and more closure than in the past.
The highlights of that volume were four final entries, which she
described as “the first and last — and the closest — things I have to
say about my own life,” a comment that cannot help but remind the reader
of how closely many of Ms. Munro’s stories have followed the general
contours of her life: from a hardscrabble childhood in an Ontario
farming community, to early marriage and a move to British Columbia,
followed by divorce, a new marriage and a move back to rural Ontario.
In the last paragraph of the last of those semi-autobiographical pieces,
Ms. Munro writes, “I did not go home for my mother’s last illness or
for her funeral. I had two small children and nobody in Vancouver to
leave them with. We could barely have afforded the trip, and my husband
had a contempt for formal behavior, but why blame it on him? I felt the
same. We say of some things that they can’t be forgiven, or that we will
never forgive ourselves. But we do — we do it all the time.”
Writers and artists make quite a few appearances in Munro stories, but
storytelling remains important to all her characters, no matter their
vocation — in fact, it’s an essential tool for ordering and making sense
of their lives. Sometimes, it’s a way of reimagining the past in order
to manufacture an identity or mythologize one’s family. Sometimes it’s a
way of foregrounding certain events, while smudging over others.
Sometimes it’s a way of finding patterns in the chaos of the everyday.
And sometimes, as in Ms. Munro’s own wonderful stories, it’s a way of
connecting time past, present and future — not in conventional terms of
beginnings, middles and ends, but in surprising new ways that leave
readers with a renewed appreciation of the endless “complexity of things
— the things within things.”
No comments:
Post a Comment